Posted in Economy, People - Barack Obama by americatimes on February 7, 2009


The root of the problem with this “Stimulus” bill is that Obama thinks that stimulus equals spending. Ah?
How much money will government spend if they issue tax cuts for businesses and consumers!!!!!

*video & breakdown: see Obama equating stimulus with spending
BRIBE $850 Billion Bill (go to minute 7:30)
*video: Is Obama turning into Howard Dean?
*article: Rbstratford writes:

“I hate to have to state the obvious here, but the government has no money of its own. Just follow the path of a dollar — the government takes a buck from a taxpayer, spends most of it on bureaucratic paperwork, office salaries, pet projects, raises for Senators, and a hundred other costs of doing government business (hooray for spending!) and finally, a nickel or two goes to the intended project.

Okay, more like a penny or two.

Let me say it plainly. Spending in the private sector, by individuals or businesses, is the very backbone of the American economy. Spending by the government does not count.”

3 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. rbs - Conservative Insights said, on February 7, 2009 at 12:36 am

    I had the same thought. This is the audacity of liberal math. You might like my take on it from this morning

    Government Spending? That Doesn’t Count


    • americatimes said, on February 7, 2009 at 1:06 am

      Loved your analysis….I added some of your paragraphs on my post. If you write anything else, let me know.

  2. Ted said, on February 7, 2009 at 11:10 am

    No to “stimulus” bill. Here’s why:
    Since Obama’s earnest drive to convince the nation to weaken its economic strength through redistribution as well as weaken its national defense, has confirmed the very threats to our Republic’s survival that the Constitution was designed to avert, it no longer is sustainable for the United States Supreme Court and Military Joint Chiefs to refrain from exercising WHAT IS THEIR ABSOLUTE CONSTITUTIONAL DUTY TO DEFEND THE NATION FROM UNLAWFUL USURPATION. The questions of Obama’s Kenyan birth and his father’s Kenyan/British citizenship (admitted on his own website) have been conflated by his sustained unwillingnes to supply his long form birth certificate now under seal, and compounded by his internet posting of a discredited ‘after-the-fact’ short form ‘certificate’. In the absence of these issues being acknowledged and addessed, IT IS MANIFEST THAT OBAMA REMAINS INELIGIBLE TO BE PRESIDENT UNDER ARTICLE 2 OF THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION. Being a 14th Amendment ‘citizen’ is not sufficient. A ‘President’ MUST BE an Article 2 ‘natural born citizen’ AS DEFINED BY THE FRAMERS’ INTENT.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: